The big risk, obviously, is that no matter who starts the secret corporation it will be seen as an American invention, or it will involve american-made technology, or imagined American funding, so there will still be blow-back. But I think the hypothetical corporation could do enough corporate marketing to sell itself as a legitimate independent force over time. Thats what corporations. I dont own six Apple devices because i want. I own them because Apple made me buy them. Corporations do marketing better than democratic governments. If you think corporations will never go to war with terrorist countries, i would argue that perhaps it has already happened with Sony and North Korea.
Dilbert, comic Strip
You cant kill who you cant find. Now lets consider the write future of war robots. My guess is that we could build a robot attack swarm with todays technology. Imagine: A drone spots some bad guys in isis territory and an overwhelming mass of small but deadly robots swarm in that direction, by ground and air, and just shoot everything that registers a human heat signature. The entity controlling the robots takes no casualties, and no one is sure of the identity or nationality of the people managing the robots. What i am describing is all criminal, of course, much the way piracy on the open seas is illegal. Keep in mind that the reason analysis piracy is such a problem is that it isnt anyones specific job to stop. So imagine a private corporation going to war with the enemies of your country. Would you reelect a politician that used your tax money to stop the enemy of your enemy? As long as the hypothetical secret corporation is somewhat transparent about its intent to kill bad guys, and it reported its progress in a credible way, i think the democratic governments of the world would have minimal voter support to stop. And the dictator countries would just enjoy watching the show.
Doing otherwise pisses off even your allies. Winning against terror by being the bigger evil can backfire in the long run. Sooner or later the bad guys will get better weapons, thanks to technology and miniaturization. If all we do is keep wounding terrorists at the same time we give them our home address, we dont have winning plan. This is where a private company comes. Imagine a secret corporation formed by one hundred founders, each from a different country, and each with a secret identity. Now imagine them with a hundred billion dollars, the best technology money can buy, no voters to placate, no international blow-back risk, and no home base to defend. Its a virtual corporation, with unlabeled and disguised homework assets around the globe. The corporation takes its strategy from the terrorists themselves.
The law wont stop any of happy this. Nor will any government necessarily want to stop it, assuming the corporation is fighting a terrorist state or group. You might think a corporation would not put the rest of its employees and their families in jeopardy across the globe by declaring war against some group of terrorists, pirates, or corrupt small government. But corporations are sneaky. You wouldnt necessarily know who the parent company is or the name of even one employee. Thats the secret sauce for fighting terror. If a big nation attacks terrorists, it can put the homeland at risk. And that means you have to do a measured response.
Some have their own fleets of aircraft, ships, and sometimes even submarines. At the same time, the more problematic countries in terms of spawning terrorism are the ones that are shrinking, both in population and gdp. Syria is smaller now. Afghanistan and Iraq are smaller. At some point I believe it is inevitable that a corporation will go to war with a small, terror-spawning country. It isnt legal, you say? A big corporation can do almost anything it wants by creating shell companies in other countries, using proxies, doing things in secret, bribing governments, and that sort of thing.
Strategic Planning, business, strategy
For truly comic relief, there is perhaps no better resource than. Scott Adams and the dilbert comic strip. Since i dont read newspapers very often (does anyone anymore? nowadays I get my dilbert fix online. . However, i dont always find the time to read the comic strip on a regular basis. . Therefore, i catch up by reading several weeks of it all at once.
I like to find one or more recurring themes (which is very easy to do with Scott Adams) and then share some of my favorites. Todays blog post provides some recent. Dilbert views on the wonderful world of project management. . Dilbert on Project Management, the first step in paper project management is proper planning, which starts by selecting a good acronym: The next step is to properly establish realistic estimates for the primary tasks in the project plan: Of course, the most important resource allocation. Corporations keep homework getting bigger.
Y., in the 1950s. In high school and college, he bused tables at resorts in the catskills. I have no interest in ever stepping onto a sailboat, he said. But I walk into a restaurant and all my senses and interests are activated in a single moment. Enriched by the 1990s success of Dilbert, he indulged his obsession.
After investing in Staceys Cafe, he started a company, scott Adams food, in 1999. Its first and last product was the dilberito, a vitamin-packed meatless burrito with a wheat-based meat substitute intended to give workaholics a full days worth of nourishment. The company placed the dilberito in national supermarkets, but. Adams now complains that rival food makers surreptitiously sent agents into stores to bury it on the back of shelves. He closed the venture in 2003, though he licensed the protein substitute to a food conglomerate and continues to draw small royalties. Two years later, he curtailed speaking engagements after contracting spasmodic dysphonia, a rare brain disorder that robbed him of his voice for a year.
Scott Adams : Donald Trump is a 'clown genius'
At left, he tries the risotto with the head chef, nathan Gillespie. Credit Thor Swift For The new York times — scott Adams, the dilbert Principle,. Adams, who turned 50 in June, has closely cropped, receding hair, spectacles and an unsurprising resemblance to homework his ink-drawn alter-ego. He is statement quick to recognize how the cynical cubicle-worker wisdom that propelled The dilbert Principle onto best-seller lists is at work in his role as restaurant boss. Certainly Im an example of the dilbert Principle, he said. I cant remember customers orders. I cant do most of the jobs I pay people. But restaurants, he says, are in his dna. Before he was born, his family owned and operated a diner called the Blue moon in Windham,.
Hell think he can run a restaurant. On the other hand, employees also say he knows his limitations and combines deep etl trust in them with an instinctive ability to motivate people. They understand that to survive in this age of dominant restaurant chains, they must embrace some of his more unusual ideas and obsessions — but more on those later. No one is more critical of his management skills than the humorist himself. Im quite sure ive succumbed to the pigeon theory of management, he said. Flying in every so often and dumping on everything. T, hE most ineffective workers are systematically moved to the place where they can do the least damage: management. Photo Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, now runs a restaurant in Dublin, calif.
salmon filet. Gillespie had experimented with what he called small changes to the dish; friends noticed them and told. Adams, who admonished the chef that new dishes need to go through a formal review.). Gillespie is still miffed. Hes a really nice guy, but he relies on his friends opinions, he said, lamenting that his bosss friends probably think a chain restaurant has good pizza. Emma lewis, the lunch manager, describes. Adams as someone who should be shielded from tough decisions the way a crawling infant needs to be protected from household hazards. We laugh and say were not going to let him watch the food Channel, she said.
Belkin, who was running both restaurants, was overextended. Adams, meanwhile, was dispatching his comic-strip responsibilities in just a few hours each morning. So, in July, he agreed to take over day-to-day operations of Staceys at Waterford, thus becoming what he has consistently ridiculed: a boss. I am highly experienced at making funny comics about managers, he wrote at the time on his popular blog,. How essay hard could it be to transition from mocking idiots to being one? Those in his 35-member staff at Staceys at Waterford can gladly answer that one. In interviews authorized by their generously self-deprecating boss, employees describe him as trusting and appreciative, full of off-the-wall ideas about how to turn around the business, and dramatically clueless about the harsh realities of the restaurant industry.
Optimism sounds Exhausting dilbert scott Adams
But never say never. A decade ago, flush with Dilbert riches, he and the restaurant veteran Stacey belkin opened a restaurant called Staceys Cafe in downtown Pleasanton, calif., a bedroom community of San Francisco. Five years later, they opened Staceys at Waterford in an unremarkable strip mall nearby, in Dublin, calif. Until this summer,. Adamss involvement consisted of signing checks, writing clever jokes for the menus and leaving big tips for the wait staff after his regular visits. Then a personal battle between. Belkin and a former chef intensified just as the big feed chains began staking their claim on the booming exurbs — thrusting Dilberts creator into the middle of a managerial nightmare. Staceys Cafe is smaller, in a better location and is regularly packed. But Staceys at Waterford, never profitable to begin with, was suddenly seeing a 10 percent decline in revenue.